Week 6: Thoughts on Digital Collaboration
(Readings at Bottom)
In
watching the TED talk, one thing struck me about his examples of a communal
value and civic value, with the LOLcats and Ushahidi, respectively. The speaker
stated that communal value is created by its participants for each other,
whereas civic value is created by its participants but for the whole of society
to benefit as a whole. A major distinction I noticed between the two ‘projects,’
for lack of a better word, was that LOLcats are often created by individuals,
whereas Ushahidi was created by a group of individuals working together. I
don’t think that the speaker was saying it outright in his presentation, but I
think this was a point he was getting at. It is not only LOLcats. A lot of
things that I would classify as having purely communal value are all created by
individuals or maybe a very small group of individuals. Examples would include
gamer YouTube channels, someone drawing comics for Tumblr, or people posting
funny quotes on Twitter. Similarly, the things that have civic value are more
often than not created by a larger group or groups of individuals all working
collaboratively. These things might include things like Arduino and VLC Media
Player, where all the code is open source for people to work on and improve. I
think the speaker was trying to say that as individuals, we can all create
things of communal value, that perhaps provide entertainment or help for a
group of people interested in that thing. However, it is when we work together
and put our free time to work collaboratively that we can really create things
of civic value and change society. And I think that the other articles had
similar ideas, that this new digital age is an opportunity for everyone to get
involved, for everyone to create. In some cases it may be of communal value,
like a meme on Reddit, or of civic value, like working together to figure out
how things work in the new American society, as was the case with the Karen
Brothers.
The article talking about the Karen
brothers and how they were able to network with others in the community to more
easily get adjusted to America is an example of this development of a civic
value. However, I wanted to focus on a bit of a different piece that is a bit
of an add-on to this concept, which is largely summarized in the following
quote from the article:
“For
the brothers, their online worlds are their primary sites for socialization and
information gathering, and, therefore, their literate lives. Their
participation in online spaces provides access to social worlds otherwise
denied to them because of their second-language limitations, rural isolation,
and outsider status at school and within the host community.” (Karen)
There
is a lot of information there, but in general, it states that for the Karen
brothers, the digital world was a place for them to actively communicate and
collaborate with others with the help of their knowledge of digital tools. I
think that this is another piece of the idea of civic values, that anyone is
able to participate in their creation. In today’s world, it is no longer
professors in their labs or distinguished politicians in their offices that can
change society and create these values. Instead, anyone who is able can
contribute, like the open source code project of Arduino and VLC Media Player.
Anyone can look at the code and look for ways to improve it, add features, or
make it more efficient. If it makes the code better, the people implement it in
the next version of the products. Of course, you need a baseline understanding
of how the programs are coded in order to make a substantial contribution, but
even someone without much coding experience can come up with and share ideas
about what features they might like or ways that the code can be more
efficient. Then, someone else might take that idea and implement it. It becomes
a collaborative project among anyone who wants to participate, and in the end,
you create something of civic value, as the TED speaker said. That’s why I
think that this quotation about the Karen brothers is important, because it
shows how anyone can dive in and help in these projects and share ideas, even
if it means that one of the only social outlets is this digital world with
which we can communicate with people from all over the globe.
This concept is present again in the
article about the two children in the massive open online course (MOOC). In the
article, it talks about how in this course, “everyone’s knowledge and
experiences were valued, and participants were encouraged to experiment and
play with new tools and ideas, as well as share their experiences and
knowledge.” (Course) This fact demonstrates to me that this concept of digital
collaboration has already been an important factor in society, since now even
school-children are getting engaged in the topic. It again demonstrates the
collaborative power of the digital world. Anyone with an Internet connection
can get online and contribute to a conversation, and often they are helpful and
productive discussions, like the MOOC. The students were able to engage and
learn more about what they potentially wanted to do with their life, which I
view as just another advantage to this collaboration concept. For me, this can
be seen in a place called Reddit, which Victoria and I will be doing a
presentation on. It fits really well into this idea because Reddit is a place
of community, a place where people that are interested in the same thing or
things can come together and discuss it, share what they’ve made, and further
explore their interests in it. Of course, Reddit isn’t intrinsically geared
toward learning, like the MOOC might be, but the idea remains the same, that
people can start collaborating and share ideas with others to ultimately create
something of civic value.
The article about the writer trying
to disappear for a month has some ties to this overarching concept as well,
though perhaps that wasn’t quite the point of the article. Regardless, the
article demonstrates again how a lot of people can come together to work and
accomplish something, in this case finding Evan Ratliff. Ultimately he was only
found because thousands of people were working through the small clues they had
in a huge, collaborative manhunt. It shows to me again the fact that anyone can
contribute to these sorts of things, even you and me. Personally, that makes
the internet that much more interesting and interactive, all because of the
concept of constant collaboration which wasn’t as readily available before.
Readings for the Week
Reading
1
Reading
2
Reading
3
Video
1 (TED Talk
I really liked the quote that you picked out from the Karen brothers. The idea that social media can connect people is pretty much common knowledge, but it's not often that we think of it as a source of connection for those who may not otherwise be able to communicate efficiently outside of social media, such as for those who connect using their second language. It was especially insightful that you were able to connect this idea to the one mentioned in the TED Talk about the use of a large, diverse community that normally wouldn't be communicate as well as they do online to create such a large project.
ReplyDeleteHi Phillip, I really enjoyed your blog, especially the quote you added in. While talking about the quote I found it very interesting that rather than using books or teachers to help them learn, the Karen brothers used social media and other online based sources ans their primary way to teach themselves. It just shows some of the great things the internet can do when used progressively. As I was reading your blog , specifically the section when you talk about communal value versus civic value, it did strike me that I also saw the differences between them the same way, but never really put too much thought into it. You are right though it seems like when things have communal value, it is made by one individual for other individuals to enjoy, likewise things that have civic value are often times created by a group of people for other groups of people to use like Ushahidi. Though both are have their time and place, I believe them to both be equally important for online creativity and collaboration.
ReplyDelete